Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
chill pills prescribed
It becomes copious and valueless to fight with you on this topic. You seem unable to acknowledge the points presented against you. As such, it is a waste of my time. Could a ''reasonable sysop'' resolve this debate please?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:18, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
It becomes copious and valueless to fight with you on this topic. You seem unable to acknowledge the points presented against you. As such, it is a waste of my time. Could a ''reasonable sysop'' resolve this debate please?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:18, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
:Sorry but I just have to disagree with you; simply because ''the Guardian'' and ''Christian Science Monitor'' peaked your interest in defaming Dick Cheney with bald face lies gives no reason whatsoever to keep talking about it. And rewarding readers with appetites for lies with more contortions to try and make these lies credible is scandalous, IMHO. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:29, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
:Sorry but I just have to disagree with you; simply because ''the Guardian'' and ''Christian Science Monitor'' peaked your interest in defaming Dick Cheney with bald face lies gives no reason whatsoever to keep talking about it. And rewarding readers with appetites for lies with more contortions to try and make these lies credible is scandalous, IMHO. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:29, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Perhaps both sides need to cool off. Ames, please review [[Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:31, 13 April 2007 (EDT)