Changes

no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Heyyyyyyyy.
 
Heyyyyyyyy.
 +
 +
: Warning: I've reviewed your edits and found nothing of substance in any of your edits.  Either add value to substantive entries or your account will be blocked pursuant to our [[rules]].  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:41, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::You don't follow your rules Andy. And this is certainly the way to respond to my calling you out in argument, isn't it? As to "nothing of substance, while I certainly have nothing to brag about in my edits, I've certainly made posts of substance.
 +
::[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Irve_Lewis_Libby_Jr.&diff=216462&oldid=198398]
 +
::[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Las_Vegas&diff=87988&oldid=78158]
 +
::[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Emilio_Aguinaldo&diff=108882&oldid=75664]
 +
--[[User:Smedricksman24|Smedricksman24]] 15:13, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: I hope you can provide more substance than that.  You're in violation of our 90/10 [[rule]] and only significant edits will bring you back in compliance.  Thanks if you can do something substantive rather than just talk and insert unhelpful stub markers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:16, 5 July 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,530

edits