Changes

Line 587: Line 587:     
:::: Horace, you have valid points. But we do have to build an encyclopedia here, and talk is not advancing that goal. I spent far more time today talking than building, and that needs to change. You can talk all you want, provided you help build the encyclopedia too. And that means far more than the evolution entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:15, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:::: Horace, you have valid points. But we do have to build an encyclopedia here, and talk is not advancing that goal. I spent far more time today talking than building, and that needs to change. You can talk all you want, provided you help build the encyclopedia too. And that means far more than the evolution entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:15, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::From my own (short) personal experience on wikis, I have observed that much of the productive work is done on talk pages.  Talk pages are used to discuss article content, resolve disputes, and other important things.  I also don't think that there is a need for this rule.  Are articles are steadily improving in number and in content.  I see this rule as an excuse to block users that disagree.  I personally think that users that disagree are very imortant to this site.  They keep us honest.  It might be somewhat annoying, if someone who disagrees with you is constantly saying "Prove it" but it makes you find citations and back up you reasoning and the like, which makes Conservapedia a better and more credible site. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 23:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
== "No Unlawful Activity?" ==
 
== "No Unlawful Activity?" ==
  
Siteadmin, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
2,144

edits