Changes

no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
:Given that the [[Conservapedia:Copyright| copyright]] is as it is, the offensive redirect may not violate anything? They are not using the name '''Conservapedia''' at all, no?--[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 00:59, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Given that the [[Conservapedia:Copyright| copyright]] is as it is, the offensive redirect may not violate anything? They are not using the name '''Conservapedia''' at all, no?--[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 00:59, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Oh, I thought they were, but maybe I'm mistaken.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:11, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,551

edits