Changes

188 bytes added ,  20:29, September 15, 2014
no edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:  
High profile evolutionists [[P.Z. Myers]] and Nick Matzke, agree that the origin of life is part of the evolutionary [[paradigm]], as does [[Richard Dawkins]].<ref>[http://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life]</ref>
 
High profile evolutionists [[P.Z. Myers]] and Nick Matzke, agree that the origin of life is part of the evolutionary [[paradigm]], as does [[Richard Dawkins]].<ref>[http://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life]</ref>
   −
The proposal that first life came about through natural processes has not fared well in recent times. The origin of life researcher Stanley Miller said the origin of life problem was more difficult than he or anyone else had imagined.<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/abiogenesis.html Why Abiogenesis is impossible]</ref> Due to the necessity of an [[Intelligent design|intelligent agent]] and the natural forces that a naturalistic origin of life faces, it is impossible for life to have arisen naturally (see: [http://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life]).  
+
The proposal that first life came about through natural processes has not fared well in recent times. The prominent origin of life researcher [[Stanley Miller]] said the origin of life problem was more difficult than he or anyone else had imagined.<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/abiogenesis.html Why Abiogenesis is impossible]</ref> Due to the necessity of an [[Intelligent design|intelligent agent]] and the natural forces that a naturalistic origin of life faces, it is impossible for life to have arisen naturally (see: [http://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life]).<ref>[http://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life]</ref> <ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/abiogenesis.html Why Abiogenesis is impossible]</ref>
−
 
      
== Current status ==
 
== Current status ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,729

edits