Changes

==What is with you and machismo ?==

==What is with you and machismo ?==

Conservative, I find it really intriguing that you spend so much time and energy writing disputable essays about machismo.<br/>

<small>(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/naturales71/4384748931/ Flickr], see: [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en license agreement])</small>]]Conservative, I find it really intriguing that you spend so much time and energy writing disputable essays about machismo.<br/>

What is with you and machismo ? No offense but have you heard of [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/overcompensation overcompensation] ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 16:58, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

What is with you and machismo ? No offense but have you heard of [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/overcompensation overcompensation] ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 16:58, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

:Unless there's a reference to it in one of his own articles then the answer is almost certainly no. It's not worth arguing with Conservative; he's probably the single biggest reason for the low esteem that most people hold CP in. If you Google "Demyers laws" you'll find a set of laws on how to lose an internet debate that were inspired by his "work" here. My advice is to give up on CP and start editing at http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/Main_Page, a Christian encyclopaedia that isn't obsessed with Penn Jillette's buttocks and pictures of rabbits. I feel sorry for Andy Schlafly, but frankly if he doesn't rein in that idiot he has only himself to blame. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:02, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

:It is because one of the more humorous things about atheists/agnostics is that they are a bunch of cowardly blowhards. See: [[Atheism and cowardice]] and [[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?]] and [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:42, 3 October 2014 (EDT)

::That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

::That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

:::Who knows? I wish he would, because I'd really rather NOT leave here; there are plenty of good, decent editors who'd love to help make it into what Andy wanted it to be, but are prevented by that idiot and his obsession with looking at atheist's bodies. I'll just add that Conservative is also a pathologically dishonest individual who refuses to answer questions, changes the subject (Usually to "Why don't you write MORE inane articles of the sort you're criticising me for writing if you think I'm doing a bad job?") and makes 100 edits a day while his (locked - the coward) talk page claims he won't be doing much at Conservapedia for a while. Oh no; he's doing PLENTY at Conservapedia - mainly destroying its credibility. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:09, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

:::Who knows? I wish he would, because I'd really rather NOT leave here; there are plenty of good, decent editors who'd love to help make it into what Andy wanted it to be, but are prevented by that idiot and his obsession with looking at atheist's bodies. I'll just add that Conservative is also a pathologically dishonest individual who refuses to answer questions, changes the subject (Usually to "Why don't you write MORE inane articles of the sort you're criticising me for writing if you think I'm doing a bad job?") and makes 100 edits a day while his (locked - the coward) talk page claims he won't be doing much at Conservapedia for a while. Oh no; he's doing PLENTY at Conservapedia - mainly destroying its credibility. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:09, 20 September 2011 (EDT)