Changes

:It is because one of the more humorous things about atheists/evolutionists/liberals is that they are a bunch of cowardly blowhards.  See: [[Atheism and arrogance]] and [[Atheism and cowardice]] and [[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?]] and [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]].  

:It is because one of the more humorous things about atheists/evolutionists/liberals is that they are a bunch of cowardly blowhards.  See: [[Atheism and arrogance]] and [[Atheism and cowardice]] and [[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?]] and [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]].  

:For example, the term "effete liberals" is a commonly used term of disparagement towards liberals. But whoever heard of the term "effete conservatives"? The term doesn't exist! :)  Olé! Olé! Olé!  :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:49, 3 October 2014 (EDT)

:For example, the term [https://www.google.com/search?q=effete+liberals&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb "effete liberals"] is a commonly used term of disparagement towards liberals. But whoever heard of the term "effete conservatives"? The term doesn't exist! :)  Olé! Olé! Olé!  :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:49, 3 October 2014 (EDT)

::That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

::That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

:::Who knows? I wish he would, because I'd really rather NOT leave here; there are plenty of good, decent editors who'd love to help make it into what Andy wanted it to be, but are prevented by that idiot and his obsession with looking at atheist's bodies. I'll just add that Conservative is also a pathologically dishonest individual who refuses to answer questions, changes the subject (Usually to "Why don't you write MORE inane articles of the sort you're criticising me for writing if you think I'm doing a bad job?") and makes 100 edits a day while his (locked - the coward) talk page claims he won't be doing much at Conservapedia for a while. Oh no; he's doing PLENTY at Conservapedia - mainly destroying its credibility. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:09, 20 September 2011 (EDT)

:::Who knows? I wish he would, because I'd really rather NOT leave here; there are plenty of good, decent editors who'd love to help make it into what Andy wanted it to be, but are prevented by that idiot and his obsession with looking at atheist's bodies. I'll just add that Conservative is also a pathologically dishonest individual who refuses to answer questions, changes the subject (Usually to "Why don't you write MORE inane articles of the sort you're criticising me for writing if you think I'm doing a bad job?") and makes 100 edits a day while his (locked - the coward) talk page claims he won't be doing much at Conservapedia for a while. Oh no; he's doing PLENTY at Conservapedia - mainly destroying its credibility. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:09, 20 September 2011 (EDT)