nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
→Pop celebrity pages
::The problem is that the particular public figures involved, routinely hire Dream Teams of lawyers and can be quite vindictive. We deal here with celebrities who spend most of their time attacking one another, often viciously--too viciously to type here. We don't want to get caught in any legal crossfire.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 11:24, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
::The problem is that the particular public figures involved, routinely hire Dream Teams of lawyers and can be quite vindictive. We deal here with celebrities who spend most of their time attacking one another, often viciously--too viciously to type here. We don't want to get caught in any legal crossfire.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 11:24, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Lets just stick to hard facts, (DOB, movies, songs, etc.), rather than losing all the knowledge. I will refactor Britney Spears as an example.<font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 13:46, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Lets just stick to hard facts, (DOB, movies, songs, etc.), rather than losing all the knowledge. I will refactor Britney Spears as an example.<font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 13:46, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Is all knowledge profitable for instruction and education, just because it ''is'' knowledge? In my day, if I brought TV-show merchandise into class and played with it, it would be confiscated. Class was class and pop was pop and never the twain did meet. And more than that: I maintain that you cannot mention the name ''Britney Spears'' in the company of minors without first saying, "This person comports herself in a deliberately immodest manner, and that strictly for shock value. Parental judgment and discretion are advised." What is Conservapedia coming to?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 14:15, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Is all knowledge profitable for instruction and education, just because it ''is'' knowledge? In my day, if I brought TV-show merchandise into class and played with it, it would be confiscated. Class was class and pop was pop and never the twain did meet. And more than that: I maintain that you cannot mention the name ''Britney Spears'' in the company of minors without first saying, "This person comports herself in a deliberately immodest manner, and that strictly for shock value. Parental judgment and discretion are advised." What is Conservapedia coming to?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 14:15, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
*I agree with some of everything here. Funny, Dew and I were discussing deleting everything by this (hopefully) 12 year old, Sunday night. Terry, yes she is she mostly inappropriate? Of course! Encyclopedia's routinely drop references to such "celebrities" who do not keep some relevancy. See Marylin Monroe and James Dean as examples of those who have. They should have articles, with a picture so the uninformed about pop culture (like me) will possibly connect the name to the face, and agree with Geoplrd as to what the articles should be like. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)