Wikipedia censures and prohibits all evidence of the documented history of the translation of the word tahash in the Bible. I did not know this when I first went to that site for information on the puzzling KJV translation "badgers' skins". There was virtually nothing, except for a brief sentence in the Wikipedia article "Tabernacle". So I wrote an article and submitted it, and it was approved for creation, after the word "Bible" had been removed from the title "Badger skins (Bible)", making it read simply "Badger skins". I wrote a related article on the legendary animal "Tahash" under that heading, an empty page which was already in existence with only a redirect to "Tabernacle". I was pleased with the results of both and went away for about 2 weeks. Then I returned and took a look again to see if anyone had improved it. | Wikipedia censures and prohibits all evidence of the documented history of the translation of the word tahash in the Bible. I did not know this when I first went to that site for information on the puzzling KJV translation "badgers' skins". There was virtually nothing, except for a brief sentence in the Wikipedia article "Tabernacle". So I wrote an article and submitted it, and it was approved for creation, after the word "Bible" had been removed from the title "Badger skins (Bible)", making it read simply "Badger skins". I wrote a related article on the legendary animal "Tahash" under that heading, an empty page which was already in existence with only a redirect to "Tabernacle". I was pleased with the results of both and went away for about 2 weeks. Then I returned and took a look again to see if anyone had improved it. |