Changes

American Government and the Constitution Lecture Twelve (view source)

Revision as of 21:38, December 11, 2014

2,097 bytes added , 21:38, December 11, 2014

Line 75: Line 75:

Perhaps the biggest issue today is immigration, and whether any rights should be given to people who have entered our nation unlawfully. Article I of the Constitution grants to Congress the authority over "naturalization", but President Obama has been asserting authority under the executive branch to grant "amnesty" to illegal aliens in the United States.

+

The power of "eminent domain" has roots in pre-colonial England, and it allows government to take someone's land for a public purpose, such as building a road or City Hall. The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution ensures that the property owner receives compensation from the government for the value of his taken land. But in practice the owner of the land is often unhappy about the taking, because he only receives what the government (or a court) thinks the property is worth, not a higher number that the owner thinks the land was worth. And if the property owner had a business on the land, then he is not going to full cost of moving the business somewhere else.

+

There is also sentimental value to homes and lands, and some people (particularly older folks) do not want to give up the home that they raised their family in. In the case of''Kelo v. City of New London'' (2005), the town had took Susette Kelo's home in order to provide it to a large corporation that wanted build a massive corporate complex. The town did this because it hoped to receive higher taxes from the corporate complex. But Mrs. Kelo did not want to lose her home in this manner. The Supreme Court, in a narrow 5-4 decision, held against Mrs. Kelo and in favor of the town's taking her home away from her (while paying her "just compensation").

+

Then, illustrating the folly of many of these "takings" by government, the corporation (Pfizer) spent nearly $80 million in taxpayer money but never built the planned corporate complex, and ultimately abandoned the neighborhood. (But the small pink house of Mrs. Kelo was saved by private supporters and moved to different location in downtown New London, Connecticut.)

+

Public outrage against the Supreme Court decision in ''Kelo v. City of New London'' led to 43 state legislatures and 8 state supreme courts increasing the protections for private property rights in their states. In addition, supporters of private property have defeated 44 new development projects that attempted to use eminent domain to take land and homes away from property owners.

===Free speech and campaign finance===

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,445

edits