188
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay:Motivation for the Hypothesis of Intelligent Design (view source)
Revision as of 19:21, April 17, 2007
, 19:21, April 17, 2007no edit summary
::I actually favor leaving both as they are. It is interesting. I have no objection to Andy's essay (unless it were to be turned into an actual article, something I would not do with mine).[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 15:16, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
::I actually favor leaving both as they are. It is interesting. I have no objection to Andy's essay (unless it were to be turned into an actual article, something I would not do with mine).[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 15:16, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
I would like ask [[User:Thammersmith|Thammersmith]] what does he mean by: "You clearly don't agree with the message and structure of Conservapedia" What exactly is the message of Conservapedia?
I would like ask [[User:Thammersmith|Thammersmith]] what does he mean by: "You clearly don't agree with the message and structure of Conservapedia" What exactly is the message of Conservapedia? [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 15:21, 17 April 2007 (EDT)