314
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:::P. S. Within Wikipedia's article on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethic_of_reciprocity ethic of reciprocity] it is referred to throughout as the "Golden Rule," not as the "ethic of reciprocity." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:17, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
:::P. S. Within Wikipedia's article on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethic_of_reciprocity ethic of reciprocity] it is referred to throughout as the "Golden Rule," not as the "ethic of reciprocity." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:17, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Fair enough, dude! I live over the pond in the UK, so I reckon there might be some discrepancies but I can see where you're coming from! [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:41, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
== What is the problem, exactly? ==
== What is the problem, exactly? ==
::3) By accepting the common phrase "Golden Rule" rather than substituting a neutral phrase like "principle of reciprocity," Conservapedia is itself exhibiting bias in favor of the principle.
::3) By accepting the common phrase "Golden Rule" rather than substituting a neutral phrase like "principle of reciprocity," Conservapedia is itself exhibiting bias in favor of the principle.
:::Is that a correct statement of your issue? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:23, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Is that a correct statement of your issue? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:23, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
::::That was my issue yes, but as I just staed above I was wrong and Golden Rule looks like common usage! Cheers. [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:41, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
==Organization==
==Organization==