Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 101:
Line 101: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Extraterrestrial life (view source)
Revision as of 04:45, April 18, 2007
, 04:45, April 18, 2007Compromise
This has to be strangest article I have ''ever'' read on this topic. Three quarters of it is not too bad, heck, the science fiction part is even pretty good. But what should be a section honestly (and, I might add, ''interestingly'') discussing the religious ramifications of ET life, is presented as a factual bias throughout most of the article. You know, God might easily have done what He did here elsewhere, and if He did, He certainly had no obligation to tell us about it. [[User:Human|Human]] 18:09, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
This has to be strangest article I have ''ever'' read on this topic. Three quarters of it is not too bad, heck, the science fiction part is even pretty good. But what should be a section honestly (and, I might add, ''interestingly'') discussing the religious ramifications of ET life, is presented as a factual bias throughout most of the article. You know, God might easily have done what He did here elsewhere, and if He did, He certainly had no obligation to tell us about it. [[User:Human|Human]] 18:09, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
== Compromise ==
Thanks to my discovery of [[Essay]]s, I have found a solution for this article. The acrimony surrounding it is far less justifiable now.
I urge you to read my [[Essay:Extraterrestrial Life and the Bible|essay]] on the subject of compatibility of the [[Bible]] with ET life. That said, I urge ''everyone'' to take another look at the main article. You'll find it longer, with parenthetical thoughts tagged as footnotes, and with a few more pertinent citations.
I still say that the Bible and ET civilizations are mutually exclusive. I merely found another place on Conservapedia to say this.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 00:45, 18 April 2007 (EDT)