Changes

m
→‎Results: remove spaces in numbers
Line 25: Line 25:  
| Bill Clinton
 
| Bill Clinton
 
| Democratic
 
| Democratic
−
| 44, 909, 806
+
| 44,909,806
 
| 43.0%
 
| 43.0%
 
| 370
 
| 370
Line 31: Line 31:  
| George H.W. Bush
 
| George H.W. Bush
 
| Republican
 
| Republican
−
| 39, 104, 550
+
| 39,104,550
 
| 37.4%
 
| 37.4%
 
| 168
 
| 168
Line 37: Line 37:  
| H. Ross Perot
 
| H. Ross Perot
 
| Independent
 
| Independent
−
| 19, 743, 821
+
| 19,743,821
 
| 18.9%
 
| 18.9%
 
| 0
 
| 0
Line 43: Line 43:  
| Andre Marrou
 
| Andre Marrou
 
| Libertarian
 
| Libertarian
−
| 290, 087
+
| 290,087
 
| .28%
 
| .28%
 
| 0
 
| 0
Line 49: Line 49:  
| Other
 
| Other
 
| Other  
 
| Other  
−
| 375, 659
+
| 375,659
 
| .36%
 
| .36%
 
| 0
 
| 0
 
|}
 
|}
 
<ref>  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,260688,00.html </ref>
 
<ref>  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,260688,00.html </ref>
 +
 
==Analysis==
 
==Analysis==
 
The 1992 election was unique for a number of reasons: a perception that economic conditions were worse than they actually were, which harmed incumbent President Bush; a strong third-party candidate in Perot who won over alienated conservatives by arguing 12 years of Republican rule had only raised the deficit; and, perhaps most importantly, Bill Clinton's ability to unite not only the Democratic Party, but a number of heterogeneous coalitions, much as Franklin Roosevelt, also a consummate politician, did in the [[New Deal Coalition]] after 1932.<ref> Seymour Martin Lipset, "The Significance of the 1992 Election." ''PS: Political Science & Politics'' 1993 26(1): 7-16. 1049-0965 </ref>
 
The 1992 election was unique for a number of reasons: a perception that economic conditions were worse than they actually were, which harmed incumbent President Bush; a strong third-party candidate in Perot who won over alienated conservatives by arguing 12 years of Republican rule had only raised the deficit; and, perhaps most importantly, Bill Clinton's ability to unite not only the Democratic Party, but a number of heterogeneous coalitions, much as Franklin Roosevelt, also a consummate politician, did in the [[New Deal Coalition]] after 1932.<ref> Seymour Martin Lipset, "The Significance of the 1992 Election." ''PS: Political Science & Politics'' 1993 26(1): 7-16. 1049-0965 </ref>
1,083

edits