| Line 52: |
Line 52: |
| | ''See also:'' [[Atheism and reason]] | | ''See also:'' [[Atheism and reason]] |
| | | | |
| − | Additionally, naturalism and reason are incompatible. Therefore, believing in naturalism is self-defeating..<ref> | + | Additionally, naturalism and reason are incompatible.<ref> |
| | *[http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com/2006/09/cs-lewis-argument-from-reason.html C.S. Lewis' argument from reason] | | *[http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com/2006/09/cs-lewis-argument-from-reason.html C.S. Lewis' argument from reason] |
| | *[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/11/cs_lewis_and_th079541.html C.S. Lewis and the Argument from Reason] by Jay W. Richards, November 25, 2013 | | *[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/11/cs_lewis_and_th079541.html C.S. Lewis and the Argument from Reason] by Jay W. Richards, November 25, 2013 |
| Line 59: |
Line 59: |
| | *[http://truthbomb.blogspot.com/2012/04/cs-lewis-on-rationality-and-materialism.html C.S. Lewis on Rationality and Materialism ] | | *[http://truthbomb.blogspot.com/2012/04/cs-lewis-on-rationality-and-materialism.html C.S. Lewis on Rationality and Materialism ] |
| | *[http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2008/08/naturalisms-hot.html Naturalism's Hot Water] | | *[http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2008/08/naturalisms-hot.html Naturalism's Hot Water] |
| − | </ref> In short, if naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. | + | </ref> Therefore, believing in naturalism is self-defeating. In short, if naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. |
| | <ref> | | <ref> |
| | *[http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com/2006/09/cs-lewis-argument-from-reason.html C.S. Lewis' argument from reason] | | *[http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com/2006/09/cs-lewis-argument-from-reason.html C.S. Lewis' argument from reason] |