SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Point to rebuttal page, same deal as "counterexamples to relativity".
*if the formula were true, then why hasn't the formula led to anything of value?
*if the formula were true, then why hasn't the formula led to anything of value?
*the formula implies existence of a unified theory of mass and light, when no such theory is possible.
*the formula implies existence of a unified theory of mass and light, when no such theory is possible.
''For a rebuttal to these arguments, see [[Essay:Rebuttal to Logical Flaws in E%3Dmc²]].''
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==