1,695
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − +
Conservapedia talk:Quality (view source)
Revision as of 17:50, April 19, 2007
, 17:50, April 19, 2007no edit summary
I am sorry to say that I must give Conservapedia a failing grade, on the basis of this survey. Only 5 out of the 10 randomly selected articles was any good. Two more were merely definitions of the term (25 words or less). The rest should be deleted.
I am sorry to say that I must give Conservapedia a failing grade, on the basis of this survey. Only 5 out of the 10 randomly selected articles was any good. Two more were merely definitions of the term (25 words or less). The rest should be deleted.
If we can get to 90% we call start bragging. So let's do it!
If we can get to 90% we call start bragging. So let's do it! {{unsigned|Ed Poor}}