Changes

16 bytes removed ,  19:11, December 29, 2015
m
Don't be captious. Vector spaces embody concepts. That doesn't make them tangible objects. Everyone understands the terminology.
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Spacetime''' is the 4-dimensional [[vector space]] or [[manifold]]<ref>Often treated as a vector space when working examples, but that isn't really correct because it has no origin.  The more sophisticated term "manifold" is correct.</ref> that, by hypothesis, simultaneously embodies the concepts of time and 3-dimensional space.  Whether one can ascribe a separate existence to spacetime itself, depends on one's physical intuition.  But that doesn't matter&mdash;"separate existence" or not, physicists working in the field understand spacetime as a useful concept.
+
'''Spacetime''' is the 4-dimensional [[vector space]] or [[manifold]]<ref>Often treated as a vector space when working examples, but that isn't really correct because it has no origin.  The more sophisticated term "manifold" is correct.</ref> that simultaneously embodies the concepts of time and 3-dimensional space.  Whether one can ascribe a separate existence to spacetime itself, depends on one's physical intuition.  But that doesn't matter&mdash;"separate existence" or not, physicists working in the field understand spacetime as a useful concept.
    
Under Newtonian/Galilean physics or Newtonian/Galilean relativity at the high-school and general undergraduate level, one typically thinks of time, and the 3 dimensions of space, completely separately.  One can solve many problems of physics with this formulation.
 
Under Newtonian/Galilean physics or Newtonian/Galilean relativity at the high-school and general undergraduate level, one typically thinks of time, and the 3 dimensions of space, completely separately.  One can solve many problems of physics with this formulation.
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits