Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
581 bytes added ,  20:50, February 4, 2016
Line 499: Line 499:  
== What happened to your atheist swagger? ==
 
== What happened to your atheist swagger? ==
   −
There is one thing I have noticed.  EJamesW has lost a lot of his atheist swagger since he first edited Conservapedia.  Of course, we all know why (See: [[Essay: A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles]]).   
+
You wrote: "Jpatt, haven't you realised this website is having a joke at Christian right-wing extremists' expense? Just read the comments section. I'm afraid this is an example of Poe's Law in action. It's worrying you can't recognise the difference."  EJamesW (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
There are 58,000 plus page views to the satire [[Essay: 10 telltale signs you are an atheist nerd]].  People are laughing at geeky atheist nerds who are turned down over and over by the ladies (Unlike Christian athletes. See: [[Sports performance: Religious faith vs. atheism]]).
 +
 
 +
There is one thing I noticed.  EJamesW you have lost a lot of your atheist swagger since he first edited Conservapedia.  Of course, we all know why (See: [[Essay: A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles]]).   
    
I think a decline of atheist swagger is true of atheism as a whole (see: [[Global atheism|Decline of global atheism]]).  
 
I think a decline of atheist swagger is true of atheism as a whole (see: [[Global atheism|Decline of global atheism]]).  
Line 505: Line 509:  
"Worldwide, the march of religion can probably only be reversed by a renewed, self-aware secularism. Today, it appears exhausted and lacking in confidence... Secularism's greatest triumphs owe less to science than to popular social movements like nationalism, socialism and 1960s anarchist-liberalism. Ironically, secularism's demographic deficit means that it will probably only succeed in the twenty-first century if it can create a secular form of 'religious' enthusiasm." - the agnostic professor Eric Kaufmann, Birbeck College, University of London, UK, 2010[http://www.sneps.net/uploadsepk/JQR%20Demography.pdf]
 
"Worldwide, the march of religion can probably only be reversed by a renewed, self-aware secularism. Today, it appears exhausted and lacking in confidence... Secularism's greatest triumphs owe less to science than to popular social movements like nationalism, socialism and 1960s anarchist-liberalism. Ironically, secularism's demographic deficit means that it will probably only succeed in the twenty-first century if it can create a secular form of 'religious' enthusiasm." - the agnostic professor Eric Kaufmann, Birbeck College, University of London, UK, 2010[http://www.sneps.net/uploadsepk/JQR%20Demography.pdf]
   −
I hope this further clarifies things. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:17, 4 February 2016 (EST)
+
I hope this further clarifies things. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:50, 4 February 2016 (EST)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,089

edits

Navigation menu