Changes

794 bytes added ,  19:25, February 9, 2016
Can we try to improve this a bit?
Line 121: Line 121:     
:In response to AugustO, I don't doubt that some experiments may by chance have results consistent with E=mc2, just as a broken clock occasionally has the right time of day.  The challenge is to demonstrate the formula across a diversity of experiments and circumstances, which of course has not been successfully done.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:13, 8 August 2015 (EDT)
 
:In response to AugustO, I don't doubt that some experiments may by chance have results consistent with E=mc2, just as a broken clock occasionally has the right time of day.  The challenge is to demonstrate the formula across a diversity of experiments and circumstances, which of course has not been successfully done.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:13, 8 August 2015 (EDT)
 +
 +
==C is a constant, right?==
 +
Ok, I'm getting dizzy reading through all the attacks on this page.  I'll ignore all them for now, and just say that as I understand it, "c" stands for constant, not the speed of light.  I'm no scientist, so I will not try continue offering suggestions.  I'll leave it at this: I don't know if the idea behind it is true, and I don't even know what the formula means.  However, I believe it refers the energy contained in matter, since certain matter/energy conversions are possible.  Can we try to refine this a bit to state what it is/is not, then state why some might not agree?  It's up to all you who have made this page, but it seems to be one thing that everyone uses against CP, and from my limited understanding of the topic, I think I just might see why.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,387

edits