SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
→C is a constant, right?
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:45, 9 February 2016 (EST)
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:45, 9 February 2016 (EST)
::I was general by design as to where the attacks are from. Mainly, I see the from outside, on various IQ voids known as liberal blogs like this one [https://cpmonitor.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/cp.jpg]. However, there are some rather opinionated and strong words exchanged in this talk area as well. I guess I don't have any other advice, if this is the way you want to go with it. If I think of anything, I'll let you know.--[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 18:37, 9 February 2016 (EST)
:::Got it. Yes, the criticism and arguing within CP is absolutely dwarfed by the criticism from outside. I referred to that in what I wrote in the Community Portal: [[Conservapedia:Community_Portal#Two_millionth_page_view_for_the_.22Counterexamples_to_Relativity.22_page]]. [[Counterexamples_to_Relativity|That page]] appears to be a lightning rod for criticism and scorn, and the "cpmonitor" web site is just one example. Very few of those two million views are from people who agree with it—my survey of Google references got 8000 hits, of which 98% were negative.
:::The strong words that you see on this and other pages represent an attempt to fix the problem. There is no simple solution.
::I was general by design as to where the attacks are from. Mainly, I see the from outside, on various IQ voids known as liberal blogs like this one [https://cpmonitor.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/cp.jpg]. However, there are some rather opinionated and strong words exchanged in this talk area as well. I guess I don't have any other advice, if this is the way you want to go with it. If I think of anything, I'll let you know.--[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 18:37, 9 February 2016 (EST)
:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:16, 10 February 2016 (EST)