Changes

967 bytes added ,  19:49, February 11, 2016
Gravity waves are not related to E=mc^2, nor to unification.
Line 144: Line 144:  
::::There is no unified theory of mass and electromagnetism.  A century and many billions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted looking for one.  Yet some people cling to the implausible equation that pretends otherwise.  Such false beliefs crowd out the truth, and I doubt there are many people who continue to read the [[Bible]] after falling for the falsehood of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:41, 10 February 2016 (EST)
 
::::There is no unified theory of mass and electromagnetism.  A century and many billions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted looking for one.  Yet some people cling to the implausible equation that pretends otherwise.  Such false beliefs crowd out the truth, and I doubt there are many people who continue to read the [[Bible]] after falling for the falsehood of E=mc<sup>2</sup>.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:41, 10 February 2016 (EST)
 
:::::Almost on cue gravity waves are discovered, a huge step in unifying gravity with the other forces.[http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/gravitational-waves-exist-heres-how-scientists-finally-found-them][http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35524440][https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/live/2016/feb/11/gravitational-wave-announcement-latest-physics-einstein-ligo-black-holes-live] As for the implausible equation, can you explain how a bomb weighing 4 tons managed to release the equivalent of 15,000 tons of  TNT?  The Bible, fine book that it is is not going to help when it comes to modern science. I accept there is some some foreknowledge contained in the Bible but there is certainly no scientific explanation which would help at all in modern study.--[[User:JamieVa|JamieVa]] ([[User talk:JamieVa|talk]]) 11:37, 11 February 2016 (EST)
 
:::::Almost on cue gravity waves are discovered, a huge step in unifying gravity with the other forces.[http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/gravitational-waves-exist-heres-how-scientists-finally-found-them][http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-35524440][https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/live/2016/feb/11/gravitational-wave-announcement-latest-physics-einstein-ligo-black-holes-live] As for the implausible equation, can you explain how a bomb weighing 4 tons managed to release the equivalent of 15,000 tons of  TNT?  The Bible, fine book that it is is not going to help when it comes to modern science. I accept there is some some foreknowledge contained in the Bible but there is certainly no scientific explanation which would help at all in modern study.--[[User:JamieVa|JamieVa]] ([[User talk:JamieVa|talk]]) 11:37, 11 February 2016 (EST)
 +
::::::Let's not reach for unwarranted conclusions.  E=mc^2 was formulated in 1905 and experimentally verified around 1930; the gravitational wave announcement was only a few hours ago.  These two phenomena are unrelated manifestations of relativity.  Today's announcement does not confirm E=mc^2; it was confirmed long ago.
 +
::::::As far as unification of the forces, today's announcement does not bring us any closer to a unification of mass, electromagnetism, or anything else.  Unification of gravity with the other forces involves then ongoing research in "quantum gravity", that is, gravitons.  As Professor Thorne made clear in today's announcement, the discovery of gravitational waves doesn't say anything about gravitons.  Of the three articles cited above, the BBC article suggests that gravitational waves may help in future research into quantum gravity, but that is all.
 +
::::::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:49, 11 February 2016 (EST)
    
== Einstein’s Relativity and Relativism: Why Einstein’s theory of relativity is actually a powerful argument for absolute truth.  ==
 
== Einstein’s Relativity and Relativism: Why Einstein’s theory of relativity is actually a powerful argument for absolute truth.  ==
    
Please read the article [http://evangelicalfocus.com/blogs/1297/Einsteins_Relativity_and_Relativism Einstein’s Relativity and Relativism: Why Einstein’s theory of relativity is actually a powerful argument for absolute truth.] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:55, 11 February 2016 (EST)
 
Please read the article [http://evangelicalfocus.com/blogs/1297/Einsteins_Relativity_and_Relativism Einstein’s Relativity and Relativism: Why Einstein’s theory of relativity is actually a powerful argument for absolute truth.] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:55, 11 February 2016 (EST)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits