Changes

Line 251: Line 251:  
::Using supportable claims and the use of footnotes to support those claims is a reasonable way of writing an encyclopedia article. There is no need for you to be contentious about this issue - especially given the gravity of the claim you are wanting the reader to accept. This is a basic and reasonable principle as far as writing an encyclopedia article and it is covered in the first two [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia commandments]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:24, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
 
::Using supportable claims and the use of footnotes to support those claims is a reasonable way of writing an encyclopedia article. There is no need for you to be contentious about this issue - especially given the gravity of the claim you are wanting the reader to accept. This is a basic and reasonable principle as far as writing an encyclopedia article and it is covered in the first two [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia commandments]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:24, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
 
:::I welcome the input. Thank you. You are welcome to begin formatting the footnotes.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS aka Nobs01]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Enter if you Dare! 90/10 Awaits: Beware!]]</sup> 22:36, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
 
:::I welcome the input. Thank you. You are welcome to begin formatting the footnotes.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS aka Nobs01]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Enter if you Dare! 90/10 Awaits: Beware!]]</sup> 22:36, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Would it be possible at all to begin a discussion on the disclaimer?  If there was a problem with it, we could have dealt with it ''after'' I applied the sources and content. The immediate problem now is, I will not have two back-to-back 12+ hour days til probably ''next'' Saturday, meaning we've basically wasted a full week already, and the convention gets closer and closer all the time, so the window to win over the Sanders voters is closing.
 +
::And the issue now is further complicated by the question of, ''how many more weeks out of my limited life do I have to throw away?'' 
 +
 +
::Go ahead, feel free to mock me once again, but you claim to have gotten quick action from this mysterious owner of the website in 1 hour and ten minutes, but get him to answer my extremely important question I placed on his talk page about  what age group should I write about some fairly not very family-friendly scandals.
 +
 +
::And I asked for a simple commitment ''not'' to vandalize my work yesterday, which likewise you hav e ignored.
 +
 +
::The balls in your court, my friend. As I see it, you have one of two choices at this moment -- an public apology to me on this wiki, or more disrespect and abuse of volunteer services. [[User:RobSmith|RobS aka Nobs01]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Enter if you Dare! 90/10 Awaits: Beware!]]</sup> 22:51, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
    
== to: RobS, re: my recent revisions to the article ==
 
== to: RobS, re: my recent revisions to the article ==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,974

edits