1,631
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 20:58, January 29, 2007
, 20:58, January 29, 2007no edit summary
I don't see how it matters how "youthful" Franklin was when he accepted and then abandoned deism, though I welcome someone else researching this.
I don't see how it matters how "youthful" Franklin was when he accepted and then abandoned deism, though I welcome someone else researching this.
I reverted back the edits that deleted the detailed description of how Conservapedia was censored by Wikipedia. Illustrating the mindset of the editors in control of Wikipedia is informative and interesting. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:11, 29 January 2007 (EST)
'''Reply:''' Exactly my point! While doesn't matter how "youthful" he was (he may have not been youthfull at all), it does leave a false impression.
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 15:58, 29 January 2007 (EST)
I reverted back the edits that deleted the detailed description of how Conservapedia was censored by Wikipedia. Illustrating the mindset of the editors in control of Wikipedia is informative and interesting. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:11, 29 January 2007 (EST)
'''Reply:''' Unfortunately this example ''does not'' illustrate the mindset of Wikipedia editors. I shows that conservapedia is shallow-- citing the strange username of an editor as evidence of their bias; is there an inherent liberal bias in the use of a pen-name? Arguments such as this are diluting the good arguments against wikipedia and killing conservapedia's credibility.
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 15:58, 29 January 2007 (EST)