1,631
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 23:04, January 29, 2007
, 23:04, January 29, 2007no edit summary
The point is that the name of an editor '''''does not in any way'''''' show that there is bias in wikipedia. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 17:57, 29 January 2007 (EST)
The point is that the name of an editor '''''does not in any way'''''' show that there is bias in wikipedia. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 17:57, 29 January 2007 (EST)
'''Comment''' The main reason why this should be deleted is that it waters down the good arguments against wikipedia; this page has be come tedious and boring. Out of curiosity, why are the names "Gothmog" and "Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington" inapropriate for editors' use?
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 18:04, 29 January 2007 (EST)