Open main menu
Home
Random
Log in
Settings
About Conservapedia
Disclaimers
Conservapedia
Search
Changes
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Affirming the consequent
(view source)
Revision as of 21:58, June 16, 2016
369 bytes added
,
21:58, June 16, 2016
Example
Line 14:
Line 14:
*Therefore, not ''Q.''
*Therefore, not ''Q.''
Denying the antecedent is fallacious for the same reason given above.
Denying the antecedent is fallacious for the same reason given above.
+
==Use in supporting false belief systems==
+
The fallacy is often used to support false belief systems, as the following example shows:
+
*If the [[Qur'an]] is true, [[Mecca]] must be a real place.
+
*Mecca is a real place.
+
*Therefore, the Qur'an is true.
+
This reasoning is fallacious because nothing stops even an avowed fiction author from using a real place as a setting.
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
DavidE
Block, SkipCaptcha,
Automoderated users
, edit, rollback
3,026
edits