Changes

:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], I think your description of the role played by "Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington," in the process by which the article on Conservapedia was deleted from Wikipedia, is factually inaccurate... or at least makes it easy for a reader to draw a factually inaccurate inference. I'll leave it up to you whether you feel like taking on the challenge of rewording it in a way that I will acknowledge is accurate, while still making the points you want to make. (E.g. it is accurate to say that Wikipedia gave admin privileges to an anonymous user with a silly screen name). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:00, 30 January 2007 (EST)

:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], I think your description of the role played by "Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington," in the process by which the article on Conservapedia was deleted from Wikipedia, is factually inaccurate... or at least makes it easy for a reader to draw a factually inaccurate inference. I'll leave it up to you whether you feel like taking on the challenge of rewording it in a way that I will acknowledge is accurate, while still making the points you want to make. (E.g. it is accurate to say that Wikipedia gave admin privileges to an anonymous user with a silly screen name). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:00, 30 January 2007 (EST)

:P. S. Some may be curious to read the discussion that led to his being given [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Sir_Nicholas_de_Mimsy-Porpington administrator status] on Wikipedia. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:00, 30 January 2007 (EST)

:P. S. Some may be curious to read the discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Sir_Nicholas_de_Mimsy-Porpington the discussion] that took place prior to his being given administrative privileges at Wikipedia. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 18:00, 30 January 2007 (EST)

==Wikipedia does/doesn't distort Benjamin Franklin's position on deism?==

==Wikipedia does/doesn't distort Benjamin Franklin's position on deism?==