| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| | * Ban all [[internet]]-based sales of ammunition by online retailers such as [[Cheaper Than Dirt]]. Interestingly, the Democrats re-added this provision to the 2014 ammunition control bill even though it was declared [[unconstitutional]] by the California [[Supreme Court]]. This would have cost the taxpayers and the [[NRA]], [[Gun Owners of America]] and the [[Second Amendment Foundation]] a lot of money re-defending this issue in the court system. | | * Ban all [[internet]]-based sales of ammunition by online retailers such as [[Cheaper Than Dirt]]. Interestingly, the Democrats re-added this provision to the 2014 ammunition control bill even though it was declared [[unconstitutional]] by the California [[Supreme Court]]. This would have cost the taxpayers and the [[NRA]], [[Gun Owners of America]] and the [[Second Amendment Foundation]] a lot of money re-defending this issue in the court system. |
| | | | |
| − | If ammunition control had passed in California, as it did in the gun-grabbing, high crime, liberal bastion of [[Chicago]], California would have been the first state to pass such draconian law. It wouldn't have been long before the other most of the current 16 unfree states (such as [[Massachusetts]], [[New York]], [[New Jersey]], [[Illinois]], [[Maryland]] and [[Colorado]]) tend to follow the trend-setting California when it comes to liberal [[Nany state]] legislation. | + | If ammunition control had passed in California, as it did in the gun-grabbing, high crime, liberal bastion of [[Chicago]], California would have been the first state to pass such draconian law. It wouldn't have been long before the other most of the current 16 unfree states (such as [[Massachusetts]], [[New York]], [[New Jersey]], [[Illinois]], [[Maryland]] and [[Colorado]]) tend to follow the trend-setting California when it comes to liberal [[nanny state]] legislation. |
| | | | |
| | Despite passing almost unanimously in the [[left-wing]] [[Democrat]] controlled California State [[Legislature]], it was surprisingly vetoed by [[elitist]] [[liberal]] gun collector [[Governor]] [[Jerry Brown]] in 2014. Governor Brown has a long history of voting for, supporting, and as governor in the 1970s and 21st century, signing gun control legislation despite himself being a gun collector. Governor Brown said on his veto that ammunition control would do little to stop crime. | | Despite passing almost unanimously in the [[left-wing]] [[Democrat]] controlled California State [[Legislature]], it was surprisingly vetoed by [[elitist]] [[liberal]] gun collector [[Governor]] [[Jerry Brown]] in 2014. Governor Brown has a long history of voting for, supporting, and as governor in the 1970s and 21st century, signing gun control legislation despite himself being a gun collector. Governor Brown said on his veto that ammunition control would do little to stop crime. |
| | | | |
| − | The ammunition control bill was originally sponsored by gun grabbing [[Leland Yee]]<ref>[http://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/27/we-hardly-knew-yee We hardly knew Yee], Accessed January 14, 2015</ref> , the [[corruption|corrupt]] leftist Asian-American [[San Francisco values|San Francisco]] state [[senator]] who is now in [[prison]] for being involved with bribery, drug trafficking and gun running of [[assault rifle]]s with [[Chinese]] [[gang]]s<ref>http://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/27/we-hardly-knew-yee Accessed March 28, 2014</ref>. Yee had sponsored and strongly supported legislation banning ''all'' [[semi-automatic]] [[rifle]]s (leaving only [[bolt-action]] [[hunting]] rifles left for [[home defense]]) especially the [[AR-15]] and even the diminutive [[Ruger 10/22]]. When that failed he and most California Democrat legislators attempted to reinstate the 1994 to 2004 [[Clinton Administration]] so-called [[Assault weapons ban]]. When that failed Lee attempted to ban the [[bullet button]] on [[AR-15]]s and [[AK-47]]s. | + | The ammunition control bill was originally sponsored by gun grabbing [[Leland Yee]],<ref>[https://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/27/we-hardly-knew-yee We hardly knew Yee], Accessed January 14, 2015</ref> the [[corruption|corrupt]] leftist Asian-American [[San Francisco values|San Francisco]] state [[senator]] who is now in [[prison]] for being involved with bribery, drug trafficking and gun running of [[assault rifle]]s with [[Chinese]] [[gang]]s.<ref>https://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/27/we-hardly-knew-yee Accessed March 28, 2014</ref> Yee had sponsored and strongly supported legislation banning ''all'' [[semi-automatic]] [[rifle]]s (leaving only [[bolt-action]] [[hunting]] rifles left for [[home defense]]) especially the [[AR-15]] and even the diminutive [[Ruger 10/22]]. When that failed he and most California Democrat legislators attempted to reinstate the 1994 to 2004 [[Clinton Administration]] so-called [[Assault weapons ban]]. When that failed Lee attempted to ban the [[bullet button]] on [[AR-15]]s and [[AK-47]]s. |
| | | | |
| | ==Criminals by Nature Never Follow Laws== | | ==Criminals by Nature Never Follow Laws== |
| | Ammunition control, gun control and [[gun free zone]]s have always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy|fantasies]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. | | Ammunition control, gun control and [[gun free zone]]s have always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy|fantasies]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. |
| | | | |
| − | A huge campaign of [[propaganda|disinformation]] on guns is pushed daily on our TVs and Internet devices. It has nothing to do with [[:Category:Safety|public safety]] or preventing [[young mass murderers|mass shootings]] of innocent people. No law against "guns and ammo" would have stopped the [[evil]] [[Muslim]] [[Jidadist|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s murder 12 people at the [[gun free zone]] in [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]] or [[Adam Lanza]] at [[Sandy Hook]] Elementary school – [[violence|violent]] [[crime|criminal]]s will always break laws and be violent with all kinds of devices – they don't need guns (as evidenced by the high amount of knife crime and knife murders in "gun free" [[United Kingdom]] and [[Australia]]). | + | A huge campaign of [[propaganda|disinformation]] on guns is pushed daily on our TVs and Internet devices. It has nothing to do with [[:Category:Safety|public safety]] or preventing [[young mass murderers|mass shootings]] of innocent people. No law against "guns and ammo" would have stopped the [[evil]] [[Islam]]ic [[Jidadist|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s from murdering 12 people at the [[gun free zone]] in [[Paris]] at ''[[Charlie Hebdo]]'' or [[Adam Lanza]] at [[Sandy Hook]] Elementary school – [[violence|violent]] [[crime|criminal]]s will always break laws and be violent with all kinds of devices – they don't need guns (as evidenced by the high amount of knife crime and knife murders in "gun free" [[United Kingdom]] and [[Australia]]). |
| | | | |
| − | [[Thomas Jefferson]] said, "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are [[citizen|neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes]]... Such laws make things worse for the [[victim|assaulted]] and better for the [[criminal|assailants]]; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent [[murder|homicides]], for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” | + | [[Thomas Jefferson]] said, "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are [[citizen|neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes]]... Such laws make things worse for the [[victim|assaulted]] and better for the [[criminal|assailants]]; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent [[murder|homicides]], for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." |
| | | | |
| | If we truly wish to increase public safety, then we should make laws whereby immediate [[self-defense|armed responses]] by good civilians are allowed and encouraged – now that will save our children and stop these senseless massacres by madmen. President [[James Monroe]] said on November 16, 1818, "The right of [[self-defense]] never ceases. It is among the most sacred, and alike necessary to nations and to individuals." | | If we truly wish to increase public safety, then we should make laws whereby immediate [[self-defense|armed responses]] by good civilians are allowed and encouraged – now that will save our children and stop these senseless massacres by madmen. President [[James Monroe]] said on November 16, 1818, "The right of [[self-defense]] never ceases. It is among the most sacred, and alike necessary to nations and to individuals." |
| Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| | Jefferson said, "The [[constitution]]s of most of our [[State]]s assert that all power is inherent in the [[citizen|people]]; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed;..." (Thomas Jefferson letter to Justice John Cartwright of the [[Supreme Court]], June 5, 1824. 1824. ME 16:45). | | Jefferson said, "The [[constitution]]s of most of our [[State]]s assert that all power is inherent in the [[citizen|people]]; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed;..." (Thomas Jefferson letter to Justice John Cartwright of the [[Supreme Court]], June 5, 1824. 1824. ME 16:45). |
| | | | |
| − | No, this [[progressive]] police state "gun grabbing" movement is more [[communism|ominous]] in nature, and it ties into an alarming political change in the United States – the exact kind our wise [[Founding Fathers]] worried about. "To disarm the people [is] the best and most effectual way to [[slave|enslave]] them…" ([[George Mason]], 3 Elliot, Debates at 380, June 14, 1788) | + | No, this [[progressive]] police state "gun grabbing" movement is more [[Communism|ominous]] in nature, and it ties into an alarming political change in the United States – the exact kind our wise [[Founding Fathers]] worried about. "To disarm the people [is] the best and most effectual way to [[slavery|enslave]] them…" ([[George Mason]], 3 Elliot, Debates at 380, June 14, 1788) |
| | | | |
| | ==Unfree States Attempting Ammunition Control== | | ==Unfree States Attempting Ammunition Control== |
| Line 55: |
Line 55: |
| | *[[South Carolina]] | | *[[South Carolina]] |
| | *[[Tennessee]] | | *[[Tennessee]] |
| − | *[[Washington]]. | + | *[[Washington]] |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Line 61: |
Line 61: |
| | {{reflist|2}} | | {{reflist|2}} |
| | | | |
| − | {{Template:Second Amendment topics}} | + | {{Second Amendment topics}} |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category:Gun control]] | + | [[Category:Gun Control]] |
| | [[Category:Anti Second Amendment]] | | [[Category:Anti Second Amendment]] |
| | [[Category:United States Political Terms]] | | [[Category:United States Political Terms]] |