Changes

:The Ninth Circuit had no warrant to proceed as it did. The case had lost the essential elements of a justiciable controversy and should not have been retained for adjudication on the merits by the Court of Appeals. We therefore  vacate the Ninth Circuit's judgment, and remand the case to that court with directions that the action be dismissed by the District Court. We express no view on the correct interpretation of Article XXVIII or on the measure's constitutionality.

:The Ninth Circuit had no warrant to proceed as it did. The case had lost the essential elements of a justiciable controversy and should not have been retained for adjudication on the merits by the Court of Appeals. We therefore  vacate the Ninth Circuit's judgment, and remand the case to that court with directions that the action be dismissed by the District Court. We express no view on the correct interpretation of Article XXVIII or on the measure's constitutionality.

==External Links==

==External links==

*[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&navby=case&vol=520&invol=43 Case] at FindLaw (registration may be required)

*[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&navby=case&vol=520&invol=43 Case] at FindLaw (registration may be required)

[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

[[category:jurisdiction]]

[[Category:Jurisdiction]]

[[category:immigration]]

[[Category:Immigration]]

[[category:standing]]

[[Category:Standing]]