| − | In '''''Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange''''', 422 U.S. 659, 682 (1975), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that implied immunity from the [[antitrust]] laws will be found only in the face of a "plain repugnancy between the antitrust and regulatory provisions" (quoting ''United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank'', 374 U.S. 321, 350-51 (1963)). <ref>http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=422&invol=659</ref> | + | In '''''Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange''''', 422 U.S. 659, 682 (1975), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that implied immunity from the [[antitrust]] laws will be found only in the face of a "plain repugnancy between the antitrust and regulatory provisions" (quoting ''United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank'', 374 U.S. 321, 350-51 (1963)).<ref>http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=422&invol=659</ref> |