| | The geological activity required to produce Miranda's striking mix of surface features defies explanation.<ref name=Chaikin>Chaikin, Andrew. "[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/miranda_creation_011016-1.html Birth of Uranus' Provocative Moon Still Puzzles Scientists]." <http://www.space.com/> October 16, 2001. Accessed April 28, 2008.</ref> | | The geological activity required to produce Miranda's striking mix of surface features defies explanation.<ref name=Chaikin>Chaikin, Andrew. "[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/miranda_creation_011016-1.html Birth of Uranus' Provocative Moon Still Puzzles Scientists]." <http://www.space.com/> October 16, 2001. Accessed April 28, 2008.</ref> |
| − | Shortly after the Voyager 2 flyby, [[Astronomy|astronomers]] proposed that Miranda was shattered five times by collisions and then reassembled by mutual gravitational attraction.<ref name=Chaikin/><ref name=Arnett/><ref name=planetsoc/><ref name=nasa1/> But such a small moon would not be likely to survive even one collision, much less five. This theory is now out of favor. | + | Shortly after the Voyager 2 flyby, [[Astronomy|astronomers]] proposed that Miranda was shattered five times by collisions and then reassembled by mutual gravitational attraction.<ref name=nasa1/><ref name=Arnett/><ref name=planetsoc/><ref name=Chaikin/> But such a small moon would not be likely to survive even one collision, much less five. This theory is now out of favor. |
| | The current favored theory is that Miranda was once in a 1:3 orbital resonance with [[Umbriel]], and then escaped that resonance. While Miranda was resonating with Umbriel, its orbit gained in eccentricity and thus subjected it to [[tidal heating]]. To support that theory, astronomers point out that Miranda's orbit, inclined 4.22° from Uranus' equator, is more severely inclined than that of any other satellite in the Uranian system.<ref>Tittemore, William C., and Wisdom, Jack. "Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites II. An explanation of the anomalously high orbital inclination of Miranda." ''Icarus'' 78(1):63-89, March 1989. Accessed April 28, 2008. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90070-5></ref><ref>Tittemore, William C., and Wisdom, Jack. "Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites III. Evolution through the Miranda-Umbriel 3:1, Miranda-Ariel 5:3, and Ariel-Umbriel 2:1 mean-motion commensurabilities." ''Icarus'' 85(2):394-443, June 1990. Accessed April 28, 2003. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90125-S></ref><ref>Malhotra, Renu, and Dermott, Stanley F. "The role of secondary resonances in the orbital history of Miranda." ''Icarus'' 85(2):444-480, June 1990. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90126-T></ref> Some believe that this tidal heating caused an upwelling of subsurface ice that produced some of the most pronounced surface features.<ref>Pappalardo, R. T., S. J. Reynolds, and R. Greeley (1997), [http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1997/97JE00802.shtml Extensional tilt blocks on Miranda: Evidence for an upwelling origin of Arden Corona], ''J. Geophys. Res''., 102(E6), 13,369–13,379.</ref> | | The current favored theory is that Miranda was once in a 1:3 orbital resonance with [[Umbriel]], and then escaped that resonance. While Miranda was resonating with Umbriel, its orbit gained in eccentricity and thus subjected it to [[tidal heating]]. To support that theory, astronomers point out that Miranda's orbit, inclined 4.22° from Uranus' equator, is more severely inclined than that of any other satellite in the Uranian system.<ref>Tittemore, William C., and Wisdom, Jack. "Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites II. An explanation of the anomalously high orbital inclination of Miranda." ''Icarus'' 78(1):63-89, March 1989. Accessed April 28, 2008. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90070-5></ref><ref>Tittemore, William C., and Wisdom, Jack. "Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites III. Evolution through the Miranda-Umbriel 3:1, Miranda-Ariel 5:3, and Ariel-Umbriel 2:1 mean-motion commensurabilities." ''Icarus'' 85(2):394-443, June 1990. Accessed April 28, 2003. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90125-S></ref><ref>Malhotra, Renu, and Dermott, Stanley F. "The role of secondary resonances in the orbital history of Miranda." ''Icarus'' 85(2):444-480, June 1990. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90126-T></ref> Some believe that this tidal heating caused an upwelling of subsurface ice that produced some of the most pronounced surface features.<ref>Pappalardo, R. T., S. J. Reynolds, and R. Greeley (1997), [http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1997/97JE00802.shtml Extensional tilt blocks on Miranda: Evidence for an upwelling origin of Arden Corona], ''J. Geophys. Res''., 102(E6), 13,369–13,379.</ref> |