Changes

8 bytes removed ,  17:46, July 13, 2016
→‎top: clean up & uniformity
Line 1: Line 1: −
A '''Precambrian rabbit''' is a hypothetical [[fossil]] that anti-[[creationist]]-leaning [[scientists]] have given as an example of what could change their minds. It was originally stated by J.B.S. Haldane (1892–1964) but in certain circles, especially [[philosophy]] of [[science]], has taken on a life of its own: a frenzy of speculation and other very typical [[academic]] activities. <ref> [http://books.google.com/books?id=k23egtSWrb8C ''Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science''], Peter Godfrey-Smith, University of Chicago Press, 2003 ISBN 0226300633, 9780226300634, 272 pages, p. 72, 73, 74, 157, 158 </ref> <ref> [http://books.google.com/books?id=b-HGB9PqXCUC&pg=PA66&vq=precambrian+rabbit&source=gbs_search_r&cad=1_1 ''Evolution''], Mark Ridley, Edition: 3, illustrated, Blackwell Publishing, 2004
+
A '''Precambrian rabbit''' is a hypothetical [[fossil]] that anti-[[creationist]]-leaning [[scientists]] have given as an example of what could change their minds. It was originally stated by J.B.S. Haldane (1892–1964) but in certain circles, especially [[philosophy]] of [[science]], has taken on a life of its own: a frenzy of speculation and other very typical [[academic]] activities.<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=k23egtSWrb8C ''Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science''], Peter Godfrey-Smith, University of Chicago Press, 2003 ISBN 0226300633, 9780226300634, 272 pages, p. 72, 73, 74, 157, 158</ref><ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=b-HGB9PqXCUC&pg=PA66&vq=precambrian+rabbit&source=gbs_search_r&cad=1_1 ''Evolution''], Mark Ridley, Edition: 3, illustrated, Blackwell Publishing, 2004
 
ISBN 1405103450, 9781405103459
 
ISBN 1405103450, 9781405103459
−
751 pages, p. 66 </ref>
+
751 pages, p. 66</ref>
    
This ''precambrian rabbit'' is, essentially, a metaphor for this puzzle: since there is an order in the fossil record, with primitive life forms occupying deeper (and, radiometrically, older) layers, how do Creationists explain that there are no modern lifeforms (like rabbits) in older sediments (like those from Cambrian or earlier)?<ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/03/06/feedback-bunny-fossils Feedback: Where Are All the Bunny Fossils?], ''site'' www.answersingenesis.org</ref>
 
This ''precambrian rabbit'' is, essentially, a metaphor for this puzzle: since there is an order in the fossil record, with primitive life forms occupying deeper (and, radiometrically, older) layers, how do Creationists explain that there are no modern lifeforms (like rabbits) in older sediments (like those from Cambrian or earlier)?<ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/03/06/feedback-bunny-fossils Feedback: Where Are All the Bunny Fossils?], ''site'' www.answersingenesis.org</ref>
Line 7: Line 7:  
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
   −
[[Category: Evolution]]
+
[[Category:Evolution]]
−
[[Category: Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]
+
[[Category:Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,466

edits