Changes

Line 85: Line 85:        +
This is off topic, but I have to say this somewhere and it might as well be right here:
 +
 
Famously, Conservapedia refuses to define sexual intercourse so that children may be "protected" from the "vulgar" details of the act. All I can say is, don't be surprised when your kid comes home pregnant because you were too foolish to inform them of EVERY SINGLE important detail surrounding sex (i.e., protection). Believe it or not, your children [i]probably[/i] will have sex in their teens (indeed, despite their good Christian upbringings), and it is extremely dangerous to withhold such crucial information from them. [i]Many[/i] so-called "conservative" parents who are so-called "pro-life" suddenly have a drastic change of heart when their kids come home knocked-up. Don't keep your kids in the dark, you will likely regret it.
 
Famously, Conservapedia refuses to define sexual intercourse so that children may be "protected" from the "vulgar" details of the act. All I can say is, don't be surprised when your kid comes home pregnant because you were too foolish to inform them of EVERY SINGLE important detail surrounding sex (i.e., protection). Believe it or not, your children [i]probably[/i] will have sex in their teens (indeed, despite their good Christian upbringings), and it is extremely dangerous to withhold such crucial information from them. [i]Many[/i] so-called "conservative" parents who are so-called "pro-life" suddenly have a drastic change of heart when their kids come home knocked-up. Don't keep your kids in the dark, you will likely regret it.
3

edits