Changes

6 bytes added ,  17:29, August 18, 2016
→‎top: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: For example → For example,
Line 9: Line 9:  
:<math> S\in S \iff S\not\in S.</math>
 
:<math> S\in S \iff S\not\in S.</math>
   −
Russel's paradox and others like it can be avoided only at the expense of giving up the idea that any criteria can be used to construct sets. For example in [[Zermelo-Fraenkel]] set theory the construction <math>S=\{T\mid T\not\in T\}</math> would not qualify as [[well-founded]]. Some formulations of set theory would allow such a construction but then S would be a [[proper class]] rather than a set.
+
Russel's paradox and others like it can be avoided only at the expense of giving up the idea that any criteria can be used to construct sets. For example, in the [[Zermelo-Fraenkel]] set theory, the construction <math>S=\{T\mid T\not\in T\}</math> would not qualify as [[well-founded]]. Some formulations of set theory would allow such a construction but then S would be a [[proper class]] rather than a set.
    
==External links==
 
==External links==
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,452

edits