Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,690
edits
Changes
Debate:Is creation science scientific? (view source)
Revision as of 16:49, September 5, 2016
, 16:49, September 5, 2016no edit summary
::Ok, I think I see what you mean, but concentrating on the [[starlight problem]], it doesn't make any predictions other than what it's trying to explain. So how is that valid?
::Ok, I think I see what you mean, but concentrating on the [[starlight problem]], it doesn't make any predictions other than what it's trying to explain. So how is that valid?
[[User:PeterHockey|PeterHockey]] 11:08, 5 September 2016 (EDT)
[[User:PeterHockey|PeterHockey]] 11:08, 5 September 2016 (EDT)
:::I think it is important when resolving questions to not have a myopic focus. In deciding an issue, it is important to utilize the principle of using the total evidence (see: [[fallacy of exclusion]]).
When you compare the biblical worldview with the liberal Christianity/theology worldview and the atheist/agnostic worldviews which typically have evolution as one of their tenets, the biblical worldview comes out on top (see: [[Christian apologetics websites|Evidence for Christianity]]).
:::The starlight issue is one of the cloudier areas. For example, the big bang model has a starlight problem called the horizon problem (See: http://creation.com/light-travel-time-a-problem-for-the-big-bang ). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:49, 5 September 2016 (EDT)