Changes

Add Murder of Seth Rich Wikipedia bias.
Line 1: Line 1: −
This article lists examples of [[Bias in Wikipedia]], related to conspiracy theories they just made up.
+
This article lists examples of [[Bias in Wikipedia]], related to conspiracy theories.
 
#In Wikipedia's page on the ABC's docudrama ''The Path to 9/11'', the page contains a section titles "Controversy and criticisms," which contains 19 sub-sections to support it, while the section titled "Controversy: support for The Path to 9/11" only contains four, despite the fact that the controversy was sparked by pro-Clinton liberals that failed to see the fact that the two-part miniseries criticized both Bush and Clinton administrations leading up to 9/11 and that writer Cyrus Nowrasteh stated that many of their consultants on it stated that the docudrama went easy on Clinton.  It also fails to note John Ziegler's documentary on the censoring of the docudrama ''Blocking the Path to 9/11'' [http://www.johnziegler.com/], which contains interviews with many people on the topic, and points out how the [[MSM]] liberals and Clintons have smeared it so much that it has kept it from ever being shown on TV or being sold on DVD in the near-future. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Path_to_9/11]
 
#In Wikipedia's page on the ABC's docudrama ''The Path to 9/11'', the page contains a section titles "Controversy and criticisms," which contains 19 sub-sections to support it, while the section titled "Controversy: support for The Path to 9/11" only contains four, despite the fact that the controversy was sparked by pro-Clinton liberals that failed to see the fact that the two-part miniseries criticized both Bush and Clinton administrations leading up to 9/11 and that writer Cyrus Nowrasteh stated that many of their consultants on it stated that the docudrama went easy on Clinton.  It also fails to note John Ziegler's documentary on the censoring of the docudrama ''Blocking the Path to 9/11'' [http://www.johnziegler.com/], which contains interviews with many people on the topic, and points out how the [[MSM]] liberals and Clintons have smeared it so much that it has kept it from ever being shown on TV or being sold on DVD in the near-future. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Path_to_9/11]
 
# The Wikipedia article on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trilateral_Commission&oldid=503687531 Trilateral Commission] makes fun of conspiracy theories instead of presenting them factually with references on both sides of the argument.
 
# The Wikipedia article on the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trilateral_Commission&oldid=503687531 Trilateral Commission] makes fun of conspiracy theories instead of presenting them factually with references on both sides of the argument.
Line 7: Line 7:  
#  [[Wikipedia]] has once again deleted all content on the [[North American Union]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_american_union&redirect=no]. The old pages are inaccessible, and re-creation is blocked.
 
#  [[Wikipedia]] has once again deleted all content on the [[North American Union]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_american_union&redirect=no]. The old pages are inaccessible, and re-creation is blocked.
 
#  [[Wikipedia]]'s last sentence on [[Human Life International]] claimed that a killer "confessed that pamphets (sic) from the group led" him to kill. This is a complete lie designed to smear a [[conservative]] group. But this was approved by [[Wikipedia]] and remained for over a month.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_Life_International&oldid=138698827] Only in response to Conservapedia's criticism was the smear removed.</ref>
 
#  [[Wikipedia]]'s last sentence on [[Human Life International]] claimed that a killer "confessed that pamphets (sic) from the group led" him to kill. This is a complete lie designed to smear a [[conservative]] group. But this was approved by [[Wikipedia]] and remained for over a month.<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_Life_International&oldid=138698827] Only in response to Conservapedia's criticism was the smear removed.</ref>
 +
#Wikipedia has a bias against the [[Murder of Seth Rich]] case. In August 2016, several Wikipedia editors tried, unsuccessfully, to delete the article, stating that the even was not notable enough for its own Wikipedia article, despite the fact it was receiving many page views.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murder_of_Seth_Rich</ref> After that, the same editors tried to remove information related to a $20,000 WikiLeaks reward offer for information on the perpetrator of the murder, stating that it should not be included for various reasons, including lack of notability and "BLP violations" (other material was also removed).<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_Seth_Rich</ref>
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{Bias in wikipedia}}
 
{{Bias in wikipedia}}
 
[[Category:Wikipedia]]
 
[[Category:Wikipedia]]
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits