SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: + Line 35:
Line 36: + + + + + + + +
→Reinhold Niebuhr Quote
:I agree and what you wrote is a great improvement. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 14:12, 23 September 2016 (EDT)
:I agree and what you wrote is a great improvement. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 14:12, 23 September 2016 (EDT)
==Disturbed writing==
I see that your peregrinations through Conservapedia have taken you into some incredibly confused wilderness; it was bound to happen sooner or later. I had a serious run-in with this person over the [[Disturbed character]] page--see the talk and history. I finally gave up; his writing is, well, disturbed. Some of his other articles are [[Fog displacement]] and [[Logic of possibility]]. I'm planning to put "delete" notices on them. Other articles are [[ABC Theory of Emotion]] and [[Gedankenexperiment]]. It's really too bad that an interesting scientific concept is so messed up.
I see that your peregrinations through Conservapedia have taken you into some incredibly confused wilderness; it was bound to happen sooner or later. I had a serious run-in with this person over the [[Disturbed character]] page--see the talk and history. I finally gave up; his writing is, well, disturbed. Some of his other articles are [[Fog displacement]] and [[Logic of possibility]]. I'm planning to put "delete" notices on them. Other articles are [[ABC Theory of Emotion]] and [[Gedankenexperiment]]. It's really too bad that an interesting scientific concept is so messed up.
To see another example, look at "Simply put, E=mc² is liberal claptrap", in the [[E%3Dmc²]] article. You can't take that out. That article isn't nearly as neat as the 2nd law article, by the way. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:36, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
To see another example, look at "Simply put, E=mc² is liberal claptrap", in the [[E%3Dmc²]] article. You can't take that out. That article isn't nearly as neat as the 2nd law article, by the way. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:36, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
:Were you involved in the decision to change angular momentum to the law of conservation of same? I think it's a terrible idea. Before you can present the conservation law, you need an article explaining what it is. But there's so much else that needs attending to -- relativity, thermodynamics, BSF, etc. etc.
:Do not get into fights with admins. Contact me at sam4557@gmail.com for further guidance if you wish. Use a throwaway email address if you wish.
:I've changed my mind about making a "rebuttal" essay to [[Attempts to prove E=mc²]]. On the talk page I said that I didn't think it could be done. I now believe it can. And must.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:59, 1 October 2016 (EDT)