Changes

→‎Recent reversion by User:Aschlafly: Your assertion is less scientific than assertions in the Bible. Your assertion that "[i]t is possible ... that the gases could separate" is not falsifiable.
Line 308: Line 308:  
Suppose the gases are completely mixed, so the system has maximum entropy as it is in the macrostate with the greatest number of microstates. It is possible is it not that the gases could separate. This will have fewer microstates and so a lower entropy. Although this is unlikely, it is possible. Hence entropy can decrease in a closed system.
 
Suppose the gases are completely mixed, so the system has maximum entropy as it is in the macrostate with the greatest number of microstates. It is possible is it not that the gases could separate. This will have fewer microstates and so a lower entropy. Although this is unlikely, it is possible. Hence entropy can decrease in a closed system.
 
Also I'm talking about finite time periods, not infinite. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 12:49, 27 September 2016 (EDT)
 
Also I'm talking about finite time periods, not infinite. [[User:Richardm|Richardm]] ([[User talk:Richardm|talk]]) 12:49, 27 September 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Your assertion is less scientific than assertions in the [[Bible]].  Your assertion that "[i]t is possible ... that the gases could separate" is not [[falsifiable]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 14:01, 27 September 2016 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits