Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
→Angular momentum claim is nonsense
:::Are you suggesting that the theoretical [[Big Bang]] really did fully conserve angular momentum? Seems implausible.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:22, 1 October 2016 (EDT)
:::Are you suggesting that the theoretical [[Big Bang]] really did fully conserve angular momentum? Seems implausible.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:22, 1 October 2016 (EDT)
Two things: 1) the entry about angular momentum was removed; an explosion in space, such as from a super nova, will send debris anywhere at a constant rate. The "spinning" thing mentioned in the entry is pretty much nonsense, as the explosion would cause any spinning involved to be in multiple directions, rather than just one way. 2) It does not confirm the so-called "big bang" theory. To confirm it decisively someone will have to take a time machine trip back to when this supposed event took place and brings back video of the supposed object ''made from nothing which then exploded and created whole galaxies and planets and dinosaurs''. We're not going to rely on someone else in a lab coat ''saying'' it happened when he's got nothing to back the claim up. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 02:11, 2 October 2016 (EDT)
== Big Bang problems - good source for future ==
== Big Bang problems - good source for future ==
Here is a good source for discussing problems with the Big Band Theory: https://answersingenesis.org/big-bang/problems-with-the-big-bang/ --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:49, 1 October 2016 (EDT)
Here is a good source for discussing problems with the Big Band Theory: https://answersingenesis.org/big-bang/problems-with-the-big-bang/ --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:49, 1 October 2016 (EDT)