Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: +
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Anti-Christianity (view source)
Revision as of 02:50, October 19, 2016
, 02:50, October 19, 2016Moved from Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservative Personalities - more appropriate page.
# The Wikipedia article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elopement_%28marriage%29&oldid=527790928 elopement] appears to make light of the tradition of marriage and weddings.
# The Wikipedia article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elopement_%28marriage%29&oldid=527790928 elopement] appears to make light of the tradition of marriage and weddings.
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kent_Hovind&oldid=739278963 Kent Hovind], a prominent figure in Christianity and specifically, the Creation/Evolution debate, is consistently labeled a tax protester, even though only about 1% of his ministry is about fighting common issues with the Internal Revenue Service in the United States. The Wikipedia page goes on to talk about his ensuing legal battles, even though many Christians regard Kent Hovind first as a figure in the Creation/Evolution debate, and his legal battles are nothing more than an afterthought.
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kent_Hovind&oldid=739278963 Kent Hovind], a prominent figure in Christianity and specifically, the Creation/Evolution debate, is consistently labeled a tax protester, even though only about 1% of his ministry is about fighting common issues with the Internal Revenue Service in the United States. The Wikipedia page goes on to talk about his ensuing legal battles, even though many Christians regard Kent Hovind first as a figure in the Creation/Evolution debate, and his legal battles are nothing more than an afterthought.
# There have been complete lies and misrepresentations about conservative or Christian figures. For example, on Wikipedia's article about prominent [[creation scientist]] [[Henry Morris]], there was a false claim inserted that said that he wrote that "the craters of the moon were caused by a cosmic battle between the forces of Satan and the armies of the archangel Michael", when in fact there is no evidence he actually made such a claim.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_M._Morris&diff=649432826&oldid=649431975</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_M._Morris&diff=prev&oldid=645978140</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_M._Morris&diff=next&oldid=645978140</ref> In addition, there was another false claim on his article that stated he was a member of the [[King James Only]] movement (and that lie was placed in the "criticism" section of the article),<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_M._Morris&diff=712927742&oldid=712927668</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_M._Morris&diff=713198044&oldid=713197892</ref> when in fact it is clear he was not aligned with the movement.<ref>Morris, Henry M. (2005). [http://www.icr.org/article/preserving-words-god/ Preserving the Words of God]. ''ICR.org'' (from ''Acts & Facts. 34 (4)''). Retrieved October 17, 2016.</ref> Such edits are likely made to make Christian and conservative figures seem much more "fringe" and "wacko" than they actually are.
== References ==
== References ==