Changes

1,074 bytes added ,  01:24, October 30, 2016
Line 1: Line 1:  
==Substantial edit==
 
==Substantial edit==
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Cruz&diff=next&oldid=1196367 This] was accidentally marked minor, but it was a substantial edit clarifying Judge Costa's actions pertaining to the attempts to litigate Texas House Bill 2. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 03:32, 6 February 2016 (EST)
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Cruz&diff=next&oldid=1196367 This] was accidentally marked minor, but it was a substantial edit clarifying Judge Costa's actions pertaining to the attempts to litigate Texas House Bill 2. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 03:32, 6 February 2016 (EST)
 +
 +
== Unfair article? ==
 +
 +
Let me make it clear that I think it is good that this article shows where/how Cruz has acted like a RINO. However, this article seems to have been written by someone who clearly dislikes him. While it is true, the info on this article is relevant and should not be removed, it is also true that Cruz has been one of the more conservative members of Congress, voting consistently with the 30-or-so conservatives in the Senate. Also, I remember listening or hearing about Cruz's actions in the Senate (or on the presidential campaign trail), and it felt great to hear that someone wasn't going along with the establishment. Was it all just show, just so conservative voters would be attracted to him just what other candidates do? Maybe, but in the Senate he seems to have a solid conservative record. I will be doing other things here, so I won't do anything to this article, at least not yet, but I think this article is too unfair towards Cruz. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:24, 29 October 2016 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits