While working largely within the framework of due process, Kennedy made overtures to the doctrine of the equal protection clause, suggesting that he imagines conduct (protected by the due process clause) and status (protected by the equal protection clause) in very close harmony with each other in the case of sexuality. If Kennedy imagines conduct and status as similar, and legally almost indistinguishable, he is arguably advancing the legal status of homosexuals even more than the opinion suggests ''prima facie''. Indeed, the doctrinal dovetailing can be seen as reminiscent of the watershed case ''[[Loving v. Virginia]]'', which blended due process and equal protection doctrines as allies against racism.<ref>Pamela S. Karlan, ''Loving Lawrence,'' preliminary draft.</ref> | While working largely within the framework of due process, Kennedy made overtures to the doctrine of the equal protection clause, suggesting that he imagines conduct (protected by the due process clause) and status (protected by the equal protection clause) in very close harmony with each other in the case of sexuality. If Kennedy imagines conduct and status as similar, and legally almost indistinguishable, he is arguably advancing the legal status of homosexuals even more than the opinion suggests ''prima facie''. Indeed, the doctrinal dovetailing can be seen as reminiscent of the watershed case ''[[Loving v. Virginia]]'', which blended due process and equal protection doctrines as allies against racism.<ref>Pamela S. Karlan, ''Loving Lawrence,'' preliminary draft.</ref> |