SkipCaptcha
3,995
edits
Changes
Talk:Democratic Party (view source)
Revision as of 14:50, February 9, 2017
, 14:50, February 9, 2017→Party name and nationwide House vote total: response
:::The name may be the formal name, but one could argue it is better referred to as "Democrat." I changed the wording so both of us can hopefully agree on it. I have no problem with mentioning House vote totals, but is there a better source than Ballotpedia, another online wiki? Also, the fact that the districts may have been gerrymandered is irrelevant. It happens all the time and is not a necessarily bad thing.
:::The name may be the formal name, but one could argue it is better referred to as "Democrat." I changed the wording so both of us can hopefully agree on it. I have no problem with mentioning House vote totals, but is there a better source than Ballotpedia, another online wiki? Also, the fact that the districts may have been gerrymandered is irrelevant. It happens all the time and is not a necessarily bad thing.
:::As for the illegal immigrant votes, I cited three references. Is that not enough? Of course, nobody's going to find conclusive evidence of illegals voting if they don't investigate. Do you really think California wants to investigate so it can loose 800,000 Dem votes? Not just Breitbart people believe this is possible. People like Bill O'Reilly or a political scientist professor at a university[http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/] think (with the extremely lax driver's license laws and voter ID laws) illegal immigrants could have voted. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:53, 9 February 2017 (EST)
:::As for the illegal immigrant votes, I cited three references. Is that not enough? Of course, nobody's going to find conclusive evidence of illegals voting if they don't investigate. Do you really think California wants to investigate so it can loose 800,000 Dem votes? Not just Breitbart people believe this is possible. People like Bill O'Reilly or a political scientist professor at a university[http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/] think (with the extremely lax driver's license laws and voter ID laws) illegal immigrants could have voted. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 08:53, 9 February 2017 (EST)
::::Do you honestly believe that voting irregularities is a unique characteristic of the Democratic Party? Last night, I added a section saying that as a policy, Democrats want to make voting easier. Over history, both Republicans and Democrats have engaged in some shady tactics, but neither party has "officially" engaged in voter fraud. I hope that President Trump conducts the promised investigation. If the investigators find that it happened and that the Democrats did it, it should go into the lede. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:50, 9 February 2017 (EST)