Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
17 bytes removed ,  17:58, February 14, 2017
Line 56: Line 56:  
{{cquote|Complete agnosticism is self-defeating; it reduces to the self-destructing assertion that "one knows enough about [[reality]] in order to affirm that nothing can be known about reality." This statement provides within itself all that is necessary to [[falsify]] itself. For if one knows something about reality, then he surely cannot affirm in the same breath that all of reality is unknowable. And of course if one knows nothing whatsoever about reality, then he has no basis whatsoever for making a statement about reality. It will not suffice to say that his knowledge about reality is purely and completely negative,  that is, a knowledge of what one cannot meaningfully affirm that something is not – that it follows that total agnosticism is self-defeating because it assumes some knowledge about reality in order to deny any knowledge of reality (Geisler,  Apologetics, p. 20).<ref>http://www.greatcom.org/resources/secular_religions/ch01/default.htm</ref>}}
 
{{cquote|Complete agnosticism is self-defeating; it reduces to the self-destructing assertion that "one knows enough about [[reality]] in order to affirm that nothing can be known about reality." This statement provides within itself all that is necessary to [[falsify]] itself. For if one knows something about reality, then he surely cannot affirm in the same breath that all of reality is unknowable. And of course if one knows nothing whatsoever about reality, then he has no basis whatsoever for making a statement about reality. It will not suffice to say that his knowledge about reality is purely and completely negative,  that is, a knowledge of what one cannot meaningfully affirm that something is not – that it follows that total agnosticism is self-defeating because it assumes some knowledge about reality in order to deny any knowledge of reality (Geisler,  Apologetics, p. 20).<ref>http://www.greatcom.org/resources/secular_religions/ch01/default.htm</ref>}}
   −
''Italic text''== Agnosticism and belief in evolution ==
+
== Agnosticism and belief in evolution ==
 
[[File:T.H.Huxley.jpg|thumb|right|200px|thumbnail|right|[[T. H. Huxley]] coined the word agnostic.
 
[[File:T.H.Huxley.jpg|thumb|right|200px|thumbnail|right|[[T. H. Huxley]] coined the word agnostic.
 
<br />
 
<br />
Line 66: Line 66:  
</ref> In 2007, "[[Discovery Institute]]'s Center for Science and Culture...announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of [[Charles Darwin|Darwinian]] evolution."<ref>http://www.discovery.org/a/2732</ref>  
 
</ref> In 2007, "[[Discovery Institute]]'s Center for Science and Culture...announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of [[Charles Darwin|Darwinian]] evolution."<ref>http://www.discovery.org/a/2732</ref>  
   −
Strictly speaking, although most agnostics in the [[Western World]] are evolutionists, a belief in evolution is not required to be an agnostic.
+
Strictly speaking, although most agnostics in the [[Western World]] are evolutionists, a belief in evolution is not required to be an agnostic.
    
=== T.H. Huxley ===
 
=== T.H. Huxley ===
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,900

edits

Navigation menu