Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
533
edits
Changes
User talk:BertSchlossberg (view source)
Revision as of 13:19, March 26, 2017
, 13:19, March 26, 2017→Whyalla Airlines Flight 904: new section
I took out some of the bold print, deleted a small section, I'll see what can b done about moving some material to a sub article. You mention the article as being in the 3rd position in Google USA. But I see the website of the International Committee for the Rescue of KAL 007 http://www.rescue007.org/ in the 3rd place, not the KAL 007 article of Conservapedia. Thanks for your work! [[User:BertSchlossberg|BertSchlossberg]] 23:16, 20 December 2012 (EST)
I took out some of the bold print, deleted a small section, I'll see what can b done about moving some material to a sub article. You mention the article as being in the 3rd position in Google USA. But I see the website of the International Committee for the Rescue of KAL 007 http://www.rescue007.org/ in the 3rd place, not the KAL 007 article of Conservapedia. Thanks for your work! [[User:BertSchlossberg|BertSchlossberg]] 23:16, 20 December 2012 (EST)
== Whyalla Airlines Flight 904 ==
I noticed that a lot of your articles contain the incorrect claim that there was never water ditching in aviation with no survivors. In Whyalla Airlines Flight 904, all passengers and crew perished after the engines failed and an emergency water landing was attempted. Also, the miracle on the Hudson was impressing, regardless of precedent: The numerous failures required paying the utmost attention to a barrage of warnings, all while landing on a river and hoping that the current was just right to allow emergency landing. Also, most, but not all of the events listed involved aircraft with engines above the wings, and precedent shows that water landings with aircraft that have engines below the wings+line of the main fuselage have lower survival rates; none were partial double-deck planes, which would cause the plane to sink nose-down quickly in water. (The KAL 007 was a heavy partial double-deck 747, a passenger jet most ideal for water ditching would be a DC-9: ideal engine placement, single deck)
Here's the final report for Whyalla Airlines Flight 904:
https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2000/aair/aair200002157.aspx
[[User:IluvAviation|IluvAviation]] ([[User talk:IluvAviation|talk]]) 09:19, 26 March 2017 (EDT) (Not a troll, just an aviation geek)