Changes

235 bytes added ,  23:13, March 27, 2017
Grant-in-aid
Line 16: Line 16:     
Since that ruling, there have been many decisions by the Supreme Court and lower courts limiting federal power to interfere with state sovereignty in fields of traditional state control.  For example, The Fifth Circuit held that "[w]here Congress aims to change the usual constitutional balance between the states and the federal government, it must make unmistakably clear its intention to do so in the statute’s language."  ''Premiere Network Servs. v. SBC Comm.'', 440 F.3d 683, 690 n.8 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing ''[[Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police]]'', 491 U.S. 58, 65 (1989) and ''[[Gonzales v. Oregon]]'', 546 U.S. 243 (2006), emphasis added).
 
Since that ruling, there have been many decisions by the Supreme Court and lower courts limiting federal power to interfere with state sovereignty in fields of traditional state control.  For example, The Fifth Circuit held that "[w]here Congress aims to change the usual constitutional balance between the states and the federal government, it must make unmistakably clear its intention to do so in the statute’s language."  ''Premiere Network Servs. v. SBC Comm.'', 440 F.3d 683, 690 n.8 (5th Cir. 2006) (citing ''[[Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police]]'', 491 U.S. 58, 65 (1989) and ''[[Gonzales v. Oregon]]'', 546 U.S. 243 (2006), emphasis added).
 +
 +
Starting in the [[Progressive Era]] after the passage of the [[Sixteenth Amendment]], federal [[Grant-in-aid]] programs began to be used to undermine the dual sovereignty of America and drive the country in a more National direction.
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 22: Line 24:     
== References ==
 
== References ==
−
<references/>
+
{{reflist|1}}
    
[[Category:United States Political Terms]]
 
[[Category:United States Political Terms]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
9,147

edits