Changes

Or atleast as I believe. Neo-conservatism is indeed conservatism, just not the mainstream movement. I'm not comparing Conservatives to Nazis, but Neo-Nazism is indeed a branch of Nazism; it's just an offshoot. Maybe the page could be edited accordingly? [[User:Whiterose|Whiterose]] ([[User talk:Whiterose|talk]]) 19:22, 22 April 2017 (EDT)

Or atleast as I believe. Neo-conservatism is indeed conservatism, just not the mainstream movement. I'm not comparing Conservatives to Nazis, but Neo-Nazism is indeed a branch of Nazism; it's just an offshoot. Maybe the page could be edited accordingly? [[User:Whiterose|Whiterose]] ([[User talk:Whiterose|talk]]) 19:22, 22 April 2017 (EDT)

:It may be considered a form of conservatism, but people's perceptions of it as conservatism does not make it conservatism. I think our article [[Conservative]] accurately describes what conservatism is (or at least what it should be). Neoconservatism does not agree with or does not feel strongly on many conservative principles. I think one could accurately call it "big government conservatism" or "perverted conservatism." A form of conservatism, but not truly conservative. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:59, 22 April 2017 (EDT)

:It may be considered a form of conservatism, but people's perceptions of it as conservatism does not make it conservatism. I think our article [[Conservative]] accurately describes what conservatism is (or at least what it should be). Neoconservatism does not agree with or does not feel strongly on many conservative principles. I think one could accurately call it "big government conservatism" or "perverted conservatism." A form of conservatism, but not truly conservative. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:59, 22 April 2017 (EDT)

::Well stated indeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:09, 22 April 2017 (EDT)

::Well stated indeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:09, 22 April 2017 (EDT)

::::It's a waste of time to even try and fit this group in with either' traditional social & economic positions, other than support for [[military industrial complex]]. They're not really even a voting block, and, no one considers them as such. They are for the most part a group of foreign policy experts. At one time they were considered non-partisan, but they've aroused so much opposition in both parties, they weigh on media allies more and more to fight back. They don't amount to more than a few thousand at best, and they idea of making a voting constituency of them is ludicrous. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters are going down'']]} 22:23, 22 April 2017 (EDT)

:::Neocons have nothing in common with traditional social or economic conservatives, other than support for defense spending. They are exclusively concerned with national security. They represented a break with the traditional commie-dominated peaceniks of the Democratic party. With the rise of Clintonism and the Obama administrations complete [[subversion]] of the [[Deep State]] to serve [[globalist]] interests, many have returned home to the Democratic party. They don't have a new label yet, other than "Patriotic Democrats".

 

:::It's a waste of time to even try and fit this group in with either' traditional social & economic positions, other than support for [[military industrial complex]]. They're not really even a voting block, and, no one considers them as such. They are for the most part a group of foreign policy experts. At one time they were considered non-partisan, but they've aroused so much opposition in both parties, they weigh on media allies more and more to fight back. They don't amount to more than a few thousand at best, and they idea of making a voting constituency of them is ludicrous. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters are going down'']]} 22:23, 22 April 2017 (EDT)