Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
no edit summary
- Sigh, seems I struck a nerve. The opening sentence contains an allegation not mentioned in the reference. Either the edit should be reverted or another reliable reference should be found. Since the Discovery Institute also has a list of scientists who deny evolution, are they also an organization who should be castigated as illegitimate promoters of science that bully opponents? Why quote mine an obscure scientist when the research he conducted is over seventy years old? How is this relevant to Project Steve?--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 13:29, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
- Sigh, seems I struck a nerve. The opening sentence contains an allegation not mentioned in the reference. Either the edit should be reverted or another reliable reference should be found. Since the Discovery Institute also has a list of scientists who deny evolution, are they also an organization who should be castigated as illegitimate promoters of science that bully opponents? Why quote mine an obscure scientist when the research he conducted is over seventy years old? How is this relevant to Project Steve?--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 13:29, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:The reference is to NSCE, which, of course, is not going to call its campaign a "propaganda" campaign. Calling it a "science" campaign plays right into the hands of evolutionists, who falsely equate evolution with science. With this term, if evolution is science, then the different theories promoted by creation scientists are not science (aka. "pseudoscience"). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:56, 30 June 2017 (EDT)