Changes

Line 38: Line 38:     
It's up to you guys, of course.  I don't run the wiki after all.  [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]])
 
It's up to you guys, of course.  I don't run the wiki after all.  [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]])
 +
 +
== Inclusion of groups in here ==
 +
 +
I think that, in some cases, it's possible that the companies opposing religious liberty laws or whatever weren't doing it because  they supported the Gay/Trans agenda but because they were hurting from the Left's boycott of the state and wanted the easy rather out rather than get a spine and take their losses.  (Not that it's right, but my list didn't really attempt to distinguish between the those in it for the agenda and those in it because their profits are being hurt by Leftist boycotts.  I think it's safe to say that most of those I listed were in the former category, but I can't be sure it's true for ALL of them.)  I got to thinking about this when trying to find companies and groups opposing the Arizona so-called racial profiling law in 2010 and found that some Arizona businesses, that I was going to list, were only against it because they were losing money due to Leftist (and even Leftist cities and counties) boycotting them.) So how should we handle those cases? [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 15:06, 5 October 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
360

edits