Changes

Line 50: Line 50:  
:No need to worry about the vandalism--we will all keep an eye out for it, and if all else fails, we could lock this page for a while if it comes under heavy attack.
 
:No need to worry about the vandalism--we will all keep an eye out for it, and if all else fails, we could lock this page for a while if it comes under heavy attack.
 
:As for how to group these, I see your point.  It will get tricky to simplify issues this way, but I though it still would be worth trying--it would be a judgement call, but probably we could generally group those who directly and indirectly oppose/support things.  No matter how that stance is displayed, they are still taking a stand for their misguided beliefs. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 19:55, 9 October 2017 (EDT)
 
:As for how to group these, I see your point.  It will get tricky to simplify issues this way, but I though it still would be worth trying--it would be a judgement call, but probably we could generally group those who directly and indirectly oppose/support things.  No matter how that stance is displayed, they are still taking a stand for their misguided beliefs. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 19:55, 9 October 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Duplication and organization ==
 +
 +
Hi,<br />
 +
I was going through one particular section trying to tabulate the data to save space when I noticed some slightly concerning issues.  Firstly, there appeared to be several lists pasted together, with no apparent effort made to eliminate duplicates.  I eliminated a number of these duplicates (12,052 bytes worth!) but these still may be some. In some cases, there were up to six duplicate entries of the same company in this section.  Since these lists do not use standardized formats, it is difficult to do automated duplicate checks.  Secondly, when these lists were put together, formatting was not standardized.  Once section in the middle did not even have bullet points. They also were not alphabetized together; there were a number of individually alphabetized lists pasted one after another. My cleanup edit is [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_corporate_tyranny&curid=138294&diff=1380027&oldid=1380018 here]<br />
 +
I appreciate your enthusiasm to list these all out, but is so doing, things seem to be getting a bit messy. I know it's a pain to check for duplicates and review everything carefully, but could you at least do some cursory cleanup on these lists? You are doing a great job of gathering these, I just hope we can maintain quality with all of this quantity. Thank you! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 20:06, 9 October 2017 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,387

edits